February 27, 2017
In This Issue
CHICAGO CITY COUNCIL AND COOK COUNTY BOARD
ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS
This initiative is modeled after a bill in the State Legislature to implement work rules under the Pharmacy Practice Act (PPA). That bill received a subject matter hearing last week and IRMA testified in opposition. As those members with pharmacies may already be aware, we are set to renegotiate the PPA during this legislative session since the entire Act is scheduled to sunset at the end of the year.
The proposal attempts to regulate the following areas:
* Prescription filling limits
* Number of Pharmacy Technicians on staff during operating hours
* Prohibition on certain activities in the pharmacy such as advertising and promotions as well as certain productivity quotas put in place by the employer
* Rest breaks and meal periods
* Number of hours worked per day for pharmacists
* Record retention
it is our reading of current law that local jurisdictions, including home rule jurisdictions like Chicago, are prohibited from regulating the practice of pharmacy and any other subject covered by the PPA. Therefore, we are confident that this proposal, if passed, would be declared invalid in a court of law.
Nevertheless, we will be meeting with the sponsors to discuss the substance of the proposal.
IRMA is opposed
Sponsors: Ald. Edward M. Burke
(14th Ward) and Ald. Patrick D. Thompson (11th Ward)
This proposal would allow the Commissioner of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection to establish rules governing the appeals process for flavored tobacco retailers that the city has determined are located within 500 ft. of a secondary school and therefore unable to sell flavored tobacco including menthol cigarettes.
IRMA supports the proposal
This proposal would require any business licensed in Chicago or any business that has a physical location to post a sign indicating all fees related to the purchase of goods or services. The sign would have to be posted in a conspicuous location on the premises as well as online if the business has a website.
This proposal is in response to former President Obama’s report on hidden fees included in transactions for airline purchases, telecommunications companies, banks, and other industries.
Amendment to Age Restrictions for the Sale of Alcoholic Liquor
Sponsors: Ald. Tom Tunney (44th Ward), Ald. Roderick Sawyer (6th Ward), Ald. Proco Joe Moreno (1st Ward) and 30 co-sponsors
Committee: License and Consumer Protection
This proposal would permit adults that are at least 18 years old to sell alcoholic liquor in restaurants and supermarkets as long as they have first completed BASSET training. When serving alcohol persons under 21 years old can served mixed drinks prepared by a bartender and wine and beer that was previously opened by a manager or co-worker that is at least 21 years old.
Supermarkets are defined as a store:
(i) with an interior floor area of the licensed premises of not less than 10,000 square feet devoted to retail sales;
(ii) that holds a valid package goods license;
(iii) that sells, at retail, a variety of food and household products, including fresh, prepared, frozen and canned foods, dairy products, vegetables, fruits, meat, and poultry; and
(iv) in which the display space for alcoholic liquor does not exceed 25 percent of the floor area devoted to retail sales.
Sponsor: Ald. Matthew O’Shea (19th Ward)
This ordinance will allow taxpayers to remit on an annual basis (rather than making monthly or quarterly payments) if they have a total liability equal to or less than $2400 for the previous 12-month period and they filed returns for the previous 12-month period.
EFFECTIVE DATE: March 28, 2017
The next City Council meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, March 29, 2017.
Tanya Triche Dawood
Vice President & General Counsel